1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 |
|
1989
"'What if he's right?' is ultimately the wrong response to Marshall McLuhan. His genius was for asking questions, not finding sufficient answers. McLuhan considered himself an empirical scientists, not a dialectician; a satirist, not a moralist; a man of percepts, not viewpoints; 'I don't believe in shoulding on people.' His peculiar approach to all things moder, he rightly observed, was 'to enter via the ground [of media] rather than the figure [of content].'" (538)
"Of course, Baudrillard is fairly far from McLuhan when he ascribes to the masses a full understanding of McLuhan's basic proposition about the media and, simultaneously, a conscious resistance to the media. But then he did not stick with this position for very long. Certainly, with 'The Precession of Simulacra' any notion of resistance has disappeared, and we are left with a monolithic vision of contemporary culture that seems evermore like a binary reversal of McLuhan, but McLuhan nevertheless. And in Les Stratégies fatales, McLuhan's 'euphoria' comes back as the 'ecstasy of communication,' which strikes me as a blend of Dionysian chaos with American 'more is better.' Technological determinism runs amok, transforming itself into a phantasmagoria of the screen." (15)
"In the early 1970s, 'media literacy' courses were grafted onto the regular curriculums of elementary and high schools nationwide. The drive to make kids media literate came from an awakening among educators to the prominent role media play in shaping children's perceptions of the world. For the hard-followers of Marshall McLuhan, it was a field day. But in today's classrooms, where teachers are ferociously caught up in the return to basics, media studies are almost entirely absent, having been packed away with the sensitivity training of teachers. Despite media's ever greater intrusion into students' lives, what little remains in the way of media training is usually offered only as a brief elective course for high school seniors." (30)
"McLuhan reasoned that, for all its manifest achievements, phonetic literacy needed a corrective, and television might provide it. Although he thought the medium might have the benefit of bringing us literally to our senses. His argument is more than a little ingenious. Television's low-definition image, he pointed out, requires the viewer's sensory participation to complete its pictures. We don't just watch television, he argued, we get in touch with it. Of course, he didn't think television would replace literacy, but it might awaken us from the spell of typographic abstraction, helping to close the alienating distance between sign and referent, the individual and reality." (47-8)
" Understanding Media develops a hermeneutics of despair, linking up the rapport to technology with a grammar of shock absorption and loss. As if the work of technological desire encapsulated an electric version of the work of mourning, McLuhan continues: 'There is a close parallel of response between the patterns of physical and psychic trauma or shock. A person suddenly deprived of loved ones and a person who drops a few feet unexpectedly will both register shock. Both the loss of family and a physical fall are extreme instances of amputations of the self.' . [B]oth Freud and McLuhan share the project of elaborating a techné of autoamputation." (89-90)
"[T]he world of scientific explanation, in which explanation explains and explanation remains, ad infinitum, and ad absurdum, has become reduced to the cliché of the TV screen; a fact proved empirically, McLuhan himself noted, when the first TV camera was set up on the moon, and began to take pictures of the home-planet." (343)
"Art photography's modern ascendancy also coincided with Marshall McLuhan's influential attacks on what he saw as the linear, literal, alienating features of 'typographic man'" (61). |